Engaged in thinking, feeling, and doing, we find values that guide us in
each area. If truth is the
headmaster in the school of thinking, and goodness governs the school of doing,
then beauty conducts the school of feeling.
Basing a life on a balanced basis of scientific, philosophic, and
religious truth opens a new sensitivity to beauty.
The first reason for this result is that truth, fully realized, is
beautiful. At its height, truth is
the realization of loving relations in the universal family.
The love of God is the highest beauty we can feel, and it opens an ideal
door to the experience of beauty in nature and the arts.
Those who emphasize the biological and social-psychological dimensions of
aesthetic experience may agree that the widest possible realization of truth
opens up the widest possible appreciation of beauty.
There is another reason why an integrated realization of truth opens the
heart to beauty especially well. Such
realization gives peace with reality on all levels. Reasonable thoroughness in scientific and philosophic
responsibility and spiritual receptivity leads to a new quality of simplicity.
Scientific, philosophic, or religious issues do not agitate most people's
daily life. Most people's daily
activities operate with truth issues in the background.
When that background has a luminous simplicity, a warmth derived from
integration, we have the relaxation that enables us to enjoy beauty around us
and to express beauty through our own lives.
On the path from truth to goodness, it has been easy to skip beauty.
Understanding a situation prepares a person to act.
Why should a philosophy of living not then proceed directly to
reflections on morality and ethics? Beauty
seems unnecessary until we reflect. The
very perception of facts begins with the organism's response to beauty, since it
is the attractiveness of things against a comparatively neutral background that
draws attention to them at all, to a brightly colored bird on a branch or an
animal moving across a field. When
divine values manifest in consciousness, they are felt as lures, in Alfred North
Whitehead's apt expression. If we
act on the basis of a grasp of truth without beauty, we can hardly express love.
By contrast, once we experience beauty in truth, beauty in goodness, or
beauty in nature or the arts, it becomes unthinkable that living could be full
without beauty. There are countless testimonies to the benefits to health,
sanity, and happiness from taking time to enjoy beauty.
Thus a philosophy of living cannot afford to skip beauty.
The more we know beauty, the more we realize beauty's role in everything
we do. Even though beauty, too,
usually rests in the background of most people's daily tasks, it is there, not
lost, not out of the field of awareness, and there is a gentle transition as we
turn to focus on it directly. Beauty
has been the most thoughtlessly pursued of values and the most neglected by
thinkers, but it is beginning to see a renaissance of genuine recognition.
The voices of Amerindian traditions speaking about "walking in
beauty" are getting a wider hearing today.
Environmentalists are rediscovering the joy of natural living.
Cities are discovering the blessings of giving over walls in public
spaces to mural paintings done by gifted and trained artists after community
discussion of what they want to represent.
The chapters of Part II show a way to live beauty.
Our strategy is, first, to discover beauty as a vital value, centered in
divinity and extended in every area of life.
We have already indicated the beauty of truth. Part III will indicate the beauty of goodness.
The early chapters of Part II focus on the beauties of nature,
experiences in which we are mostly receptive, and the later chapters focus on beauty as experienced in
human activities such as gardening,
humor, sports, and the fine arts. The
second part of the strategy, discussed toward the end of Part II, is to develop the
art of living, emphasizing beauty, feeling, and lessons from the arts.
The culminating thought is that beauty
is a quality of divinity that we can live.
A class of students, invited to write about a favorite place in nature,
produced eloquent and soaring affirmations beyond anything they had previously
written previously in the course.
A
group of adults, gathered for a meeting in a series on
the philosophy of living, were asked to recall a favorite place in nature and to
consider why it was meaningful to them. The
sharing that followed brought unprecedented warmth into the group.
The reader may wish to do the same before reading further.
What is it about natural beauty that touches us so deeply? How can we expand our appreciation? If a child's delight in natural beauty is the beginning of
this trail of appreciation, where does the trail end? Should it not be possible to combine the experiences of a
naturalist, philosopher, mystic, artist, and ecological activist?
Imagine a film in which the camera first slowly takes in a beautiful
scene, picking up the sounds of wind and water and insects and birds. Footage may be taken at dawn, morning, midday, afternoon,
sunset, evening, night; in spring, summer, autumn, winter; in fair weather and
in storms. After several minutes in
the simplicity of this opening evocation, attention turns to geologic features,
to meteorology, to the details of a particular shrub or tree, a bird's nest, an
insect colony, some animal behavior, to rouse our recollection of the complexity
that awaits us beyond the surface of what we notice first.
Commentary adds scientific description.
Then the camera goes back to the initial level of focus, completing the
first of several cycles in the film. Returning
to the first scene, simple enjoyment harvests something of the previous foray
into science.
In another cycle, one sees artists' renditions of the scene or something
like it; in another, words of poetry depict the scene.
A historical tableau could be constructed, recalling dramas of historic
and prehistoric peoples. What
conflicts have transpired? What
exploitation, protection, and restoration of the land?
What sports and games have flourished there? What have past peoples appreciated about this area?
What are the possibilities for the area in the future?
After cycles featuring various aspects that add meaning to the scene, the
film ends with the initial setting. The
realization dawns that the beauty of this scene tacitly reflects all these
dimensions. Perceptual enjoyment is
more than the organism's physical response, since it now engages the entire
self. A film or a conference or a
flight of imagination can all bring home the idea that an interdisciplinary
approach enhances the appreciation of natural beauty.
This chapter moves from simple to complex awareness of natural beauty.
We start with a beginner's lesson, a reminder of the range of experiences
of natural beauty, the importance of taking time for such experiences, the
significance of our favorite places in nature, and the contrast between the
beautiful and the plain. Finally,
we consider how to enhance our appreciation of natural beauty through an
interdisciplinary approach including the sciences, philosophy, religion, and the
arts.
Initial
experiences
Think of walking among fragrant blossoms in spring, smelling the sweet,
heavy air of a summer field after rain, seeing the brilliant reds and yellows of
autumn leaves against the dark green of conifers, walking over newly fallen snow
as bright sunlight illumines thinly iced tree branches, lying on sand dunes
watching waves approach the shore, discovering an isolated cove where the beach
is white and the water turquoise, riding horseback in the mountains, wading in a
clear mountain stream, swimming in a river, coming across deer and staying with
them in stillness for a long time, watching fog cascade over hills, gazing up
the length of a giant Sequoia tree in a redwood forest, dozing on a thick bed of
pine needles on the sunlit floor of a forest, striding through fields sprinkled
with wildflowers, walking into the caress of a gentle breeze or the bracing
tonic of a cool wind, running up hills and finding lakes.
Experiences of natural beauty could be variously classified. In some experiences a single sense is predominant, while
other are more multidimensional. Some
find beauty on the micro level, some on the ordinary level, some on the macro
level. Some turn to the heavens,
some to the earth. Some experiences
are more receptive, others more active. The
level of contrast between the focus and the background may be high or low.
Some experiences are particularly linked to natural cycles such as
seasons of the year or times of the day. Some
are saturated with a sense of higher meaning and value, while others are more
matter of fact. Most are centered
outside the self, but some are enjoyments of the self or of the self in relation
to another.
Places of natural beauty stand out against a background of commonplace
landscape. A hardy soul can find an
austere attractiveness in the endless dusty flatness of west Texas, but Yosemite
Valley with its abrupt cliffs, waterfalls, green valley, trees, and sparkling
river enchants the eye. The value
of the spectacular spots doesn't of course justify neglecting the aesthetic
values of the surrounding territory, but a beautiful phenomenon--like anything
we notice--inevitably has the structure of a figure-against-a-background.
An unappealing scene has beauties that disclose themselves on a different
scale. Shifting to a microscopic
level, one finds wonders of biology and physics.
Shifting to the macroscopic scale, one finds wonders of the planet and
the solar system. The point of
shifting scale is not to deny ugliness but to illustrate the freedom of a seeker
after beauty and to suggest that, in well-chosen perspective, beauty is the last
word.
Spending time outdoors enhances positive personal qualities. Backpackers tend to have a more simple and natural way of
expressing themselves and doing things, a more natural attitude about the body
and physical pleasure. A layer of
social artificiality is gone. Physical
effort disciplined by nature's rhythms keeps the mind from racing.
The greatest lives show a joy in natural living and an appreciation for
the beauties of nature. Their trust
in nature and affirmation of the process of life combine with their commitment
to improve existence on our polluted and disease-stricken planet on which
hundreds of species become extinct every year.
Persons are greater than problems, and in spite of everything these
people go on noticing, enjoying, and enhancing the beauty around them. Beauty nourishes them for whatever tasks are theirs.
One reason we enjoy natural beauty is that experiencing it promotes
health. Health of course is partly
a gift of heredity and partly a matter of enjoying proper nutrition, rest, and
exercise in a relatively unpolluted environment.
But health is to an unsuspected degree a consequence of a living in a way
that integrates truth, beauty, and goodness. Receptivity to natural beauty is not wholly passive, not just
looking at photographs of picturesque sites.
While there is a contemplative side to enjoying beauty, there is also an
active side. The very effort to get
to the vista is an essential phase of the temporal background of the experience.
The quickening of the pulse, the exertion of muscles, the filling of the
lungs--these are all part of the total experience.
Cultivating
appreciation: Taking time
The first lesson in learning to appreciate some particularly beautiful
natural scene is to take time to experience the scene and its qualities.
The hasty "experience" of the tourist does not suffice.
The vista sampled, the snapshot taken, the postcard purchased--none of
these accomplishes the mission. Time
is required for the experience to sink in, to make a lasting impression, adding
to your gallery of memories, as you gather treasures to recall in time of need.
It takes time to feel rhythms. There
is a rhythm in any phenomenon, in the course of a day or the seasons of the
year. A sunset comes to a peak of
radiance and then it begins to fade. Some
rhythms pertain to the experiencer. Each
experience has its gradual or sudden onset, its culmination, and its phase of
decline. In addition, the
appreciative mind cannot respond fully for long.
After a while, fatigue sets in, and the art of experiencing does not
strain to sustain the experience unnaturally.
Comprehending beauty involves recognizing something akin to melody
insofar the movement of experience follows some primary focus of attention.
There is melody in the flight of a bird as well as in the song of the
bird. And comprehending beauty involves being able to grasp
harmonies in complex appearances.
Taking time for natural beauty makes a difference in your perceptions at
other times. You may start noticing
more what is going on in the sky and how the seasons are changing.
You may begin to wake up, not merely with the sense of awaking in this
room or in this house, but on this continental landmass, for example.
You may start observing the moods of nature more and their influence on
people. You may notice how normal
living is pervaded by other background pleasures that go unnoticed, including
breathing fresh air and our ability to move as we desire and the mind's resting
in the comfort provided by the supporting brain when the posture is erect.
Natural
sciences and aesthetic appreciation
Experience of nature begins in perception of what is there and what is
happening. In perception, lures to
scientific and aesthetic exploration commingle.
There is always more to experience than our senses can take in at any
given moment. The very delight in
phenomena attracts scientific inquiry, and each success of scientific
understanding enables the growth of appreciation.
Of course, scientific and aesthetic attitudes toward a landscape are
different. Science narrates the
invisible structure of the trees and the geologic history of the hills, counts
the populations of species, measures annual rainfall, and explores relationships
within ecosystems. Aesthetic
appreciation follows the visible structure of a landscape, its present look and
feel, the balance of horizontal and vertical vectors and curves, and the sights
and sounds and smells as they are felt by the experiencer.
Sometimes the scientific and aesthetic attitudes seem antagonistic; an
aesthetic response does not suffice when science is required, nor can science
satisfy the soul when it craves the beauty of nature.
Too high a proportion of science crowds out aesthetic enjoyment.
Science makes possible reductionistic analyses of the aesthetic response.
It has been argued that the response of awe to the starry sky is
basically due to the way the receptive eye is gently and approximately equally
stimulated over the entire retina. This
stimulation results in a sublime sense of space, an experience that underlies
and gives emotional power to the idea of infinity.
It has been argued that the pleasure we take in the prospect afforded by
a high promontory is rooted in the organism's evolutionary biologic interest in
overlooks from which an animal can watch for prey and observe its enemies.
Every such observation tells part of the story, but not necessarily the
heart of the story of our experience of the beauties of nature.
Nevertheless, with the qualifications just noted, the landscape is the
locus of aesthetic enjoyment and a better understanding of the landscape makes
for a better aesthetic experience. Background
scientific knowledge enhances aesthetic perception in various ways.
The first way is simply to draw careful attention to what would otherwise
be missed. For example, learning
about insects that one initially finds repulsive make it possible to prize them
aesthetically by drawing observation to the more microscopic level where the
details of the tiny creatures can be seen.
Figuring out how an island formed in a river just downstream from a dry
creek bed through which water and silt once poured into the river gives a
context for savoring the island as a phenomenon.
One feels pleasure in having understood a moment of cosmic process; and
there is something attractive in the very laws of gravity and inertia.
These intellectual pleasures add to the delight in perceivable beauty.
Even modest information about the geologic history of an area can add a
remarkable dimension to one's present experience.
Usually a landscape seems static, except for such transient events as the
blowing of grasses. Usually when we
say "now" we refer to a narrow stretch of time.
But a sense of process over long periods of time--when the region was,
say, under water or when the glaciers of the ice age retreated leaving boulders
in newly carved valleys--imparts a dynamic sense to the landscape and vastly
expands the dimensions of our sense of the present.
Watch a sunset sometime keeping in mind that it is the earth's rotation
that is responsible for the phenomenon. One
can in fact experience a sunset as a consequence of the earth's turning, and
this yields an uncanny sense of one's own motion as the earth turns silently
with absolutely no felt trace of bumpiness or acceleration or pressure.
The earth, along with its stability as a foundation we take for granted,
involves us in a gentle dynamism of irresistible motion.
Scientific information can alter the perception of beauty. A scene with small patches of woods separated by cultivated
fields and small villages might have seemed fully delightful until you learn
about the need of some species for connected
patches of forest, so that a habitat large enough for the species remains
available. In the light of that,
one may well find more beauty in a scene where wooded corridors connect larger
forested areas. Visual appeal is
linked to other kinds of appeal.
Science discloses pattern in nature.
The organism's perceptual response is so attracted to pattern that it
cannot sustain attention and awareness when confronted with something that it
can only perceive as sheer consistency of texture or an uncoordinated jumble of
data. Something must emerge into
prominence for perception to occur. This
is a pervasive trait that attunes an infant to the human face, especially the
face of the mother. Perception is
in the business of adequately rendering relevant features of the environment.
It attunes a predator to its prey, an animal to its mate.
The environment is not an incoherent mass of equi-significant detail, but
an arena with at least biological significance to each type of creature. Some figure must detach itself as of greater moment than what
thus becomes its background. What
broader significance might there be to our orientation to pattern?
And how far can mathematics and physics go in giving an account of
pattern in nature?
How much unsuspected pattern pervades the world around us?
A magnificent oak tree viewed from a distance approximates the shape of a
parabola. As incalculable as the
shapes of waves may be, they give the impression of an implicit mathematics and
physics. Seashells and sunflower
heads manifest a curve that can be generated from the Fibonacci series of
numbers--1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, and so on, in which the next member of the series
is the sum of the previous two. The
mathematics of fractals, where large-scale patterns are repeated on smaller
scales, have drawn attention to the pattern in the seemingly random shape of a
coastline.
Science gives mathematical accounts of patterns, but nature is always
more complex than the mathematical description.
The attractiveness of the thin sliver of moon depends on the spherical
appearance of the moon and the shadow cast by the earth, though neither body is
a perfect sphere. Nature shows a
combination of regularity and irregularity, and the combination is essential to
natural beauty.
Interpretation
and nature
This section is the first of four that address philosophical issues,
broadly speaking, in the aesthetics of nature.
Nature stimulates the quest for meaning and creative design without ever
satisfying it in an intellectually definitive way. Experience is suggestive.
Watch the sun come up behind a range of mountains.
Before the sun itself is visible, the gradual process looks like the
unfolding of a slow-motion explosion. In
the sudden moment of discontinuity you see a light shape whiter and brighter
than yellow, which quickly rises to spill its basket of golden dust into the
waking valley. The sense of something akin to generosity in the sun's pouring forth is spontaneous.
Can this sense be explained in terms of the biologic needs of the
creature for light and warmth? How much is the feeling dependent on the comfort of being
safe from the harshness of the sun? What
role do the cultural connotations of gold and white play in the experience?
What degree of reciprocal influence exists between the sense of the sun's
generosity and religious ideas of a generous Creator?
In the experience of beauty these questions are neither posed nor
answered, but wonder stirs the soul root of such questioning.
Comprehending natural beauty involves sensitivity to the way a scene almost
speaks.
Given a human craving to find natural reflections of spiritual
principles, what shall we make of the ideas that arise in a contemplative moment
in nature? It is all too easy to
read lessons into landscape and to see allegories in the seasons. Suppose you are wandering in the woods, wrestling with a
problem, and you come across a quiet stream.
As you watch the water in openness, its gradual, winding flow comes to
symbolize the patience you need at this time in your life, and you quietly
rejoice that nature has conveyed this insight.
Caution counsels that realizations like this, however relevant they may
be to the individual's need of the moment, and however charmingly they may be
symbolized in the natural setting, may be more safely interpreted as the mind's
harvest not only from nature but also from the confluence of subconscious and
superconscious sources. When storm
clouds darken the water and sunlight enters the scene most directly only through
a small hole in the upper layer of clouds, reflected from there to the upper
surface of a lower layer of broken clouds, only to bounce back up to the
undersurface of the higher layer, and thence to reflect a pillar of light
straight down onto the waves--the observer can be in awe without translating the
scene into religious allegory.
The very interpretation of nature as a self-contained, autonomous realm
independent of mind and spirit arose when early modern science separated itself
from some of the religious and philosophic ideas associated with older science.
The modern scientific concept of nature as devoid of purpose encouraged
the study of nature's mechanisms. However,
once the mechanistic thinking of the European "Enlightenment" had
claimed the whole of nature for itself, Romantic aesthetic sensibility reopened
the question of nature's relation to mind and spirit.
Nature became a symbol of untold depth, where conscious, subconscious,
and superconscious converge.
For many of us, then, experiences of nature have profound religious
overtones. The experience of beauty
nevertheless offers a much-needed vacation from religious thinking, and
philosophy and theology should not over-interpret.
On the broad spectrum of responses to natural beauty, it is wise to avoid
the extreme of indifference and the extreme of nature worship.
There is a temptation to impose our interpretations on nature as though
they were insights. The variety of
human experiences and interpretations of nature suggests that nature is
comparatively passive to interpretation and that interpretation is influenced by
convictions taken from other parts of one's philosophy or religion.
The truth of these interpretations depends more on the truth of the
associated philosophy or religion than on a simple ability to discern meaning in
nature. Nature, then, is neither a
meaningless chaos nor a text to be read. Nature's
meaningfulness is its mysterious stimulus to interpretation.
The happy situation is that the experience of beauty is not primarily a
discourse. Even the most active and
thorough aesthetic exploration of a scene serves mainly to deepen the quiet of
beholding. Even the remarks between
friends taking a walk to enjoy nature, as one mentions something noteworthy to
the other, occur in a cycles in which noticing precedes and culminates each
remark. Enjoying the beauties of
nature is a vacation from science, philosophy, theology, and ethics, and to
shift into such topics abandons aesthetic experience.
It is in quiet receptivity that other areas of activity tacitly convey
their contributions to the experience.
From an interdisciplinary perspective, comprehension of beauty thus
involves description of what is perceived, acknowledgement of the influences of
areas of concern (science, religion, etc.) that are distinct but indirectly
relevant, and confession of the incompleteness of one's grasp.
Our
favorite places
What are the characteristics of people's favorite places in nature as
they report them? The testimonies I
have heard and read converge on a number of themes.
The appeal to the senses is only part of the story.
Often such a place is a protected location or refuge, somehow sheltered.
Where one feels secure, a wide-open space will serve as well, a beach, a
mountain summit. Adventuresome
types prefer open seas, the face of a cliff, or wilderness areas shared with
other predators.
The very expression "a place in nature" implies separation from
ordinary society, relative solitude. People's
favorite places offer a vacation from the daily pressure of other people's
expectations, from social emotions, from the stress of refereeing the contest
between egoistic and altruistic impulses--in short, from other human beings.
Sometimes favored spots are places to go with a friend or with family.
At the limit, for people among a crowd of strangers watching a sunset,
the viewers have an unhindered view of the sunset.
To be sure, solitude is partial, even when we are all by ourselves.
The place of relative solitude is such precisely in relation to the
society from which we have temporarily removed ourselves and to which we will
return. Moreover, in solitude we
continue to be social beings, and our reflections go on in the language of our
culture.
Many people seek solitude in nature in order to commune. A favorite place in nature is a place to get more deeply in
touch with what is truest in oneself. It
is a place for spiritual communion. The
ambiguity of the word "commune" mirrors fittingly the indefinite and
vague experience, so little verbal, so little busy with thoughts, so open to
inspiration without any straining or striving, without any clear sense of the
source from which inspiration is sought. It
is a place to put things in perspective. The perplexing problems of the passing hour recede in their
urgency. One recovers a sense that
one is not, after all, the center of the universe; and, remarkably, this
recovery of perspective does not normally bring a feeling that one's own life is
negligible, meaningless, superfluous, or useless. Indeed, one often returns from a time of communing in nature
with a refreshed sense of purpose. It
is a prescription for groups suffering from tension to go for a vacation in
nature, putting aside all conversation about troubling issues.
To be sure, nature functions in many ways other than through its beauty,
and favorite places in nature need not be particularly beautiful.
Nevertheless,
the beauty of a scene is a value that is distinguishable from other dimensions
associated with the experience. The
engine of the mind is not turned off, but neither is it engaged with the gears
of the scientific, philosophic, and religious intellect.
Practical goals are laid down for a while, as the harmony of physical
contrasts absorbs attention.
Enjoying the beauties of nature in relative solitude has such satisfying
appeal that people commonly experience the universe there as a friendly place.
There is a sense of being embraced in something wonderful beyond measure,
being part of something grand, a sense of invitation and welcome.
The commingling of affirmation arising within oneself and the joy in what
we perceive seem in such moments to disclose a deeper truth and goodness than we
usually notice. Enjoyment gives way
to rejoicing.
Myth
#1: Beauty is merely subjective
To appreciate the significance of beauty, it helps to be free of two
widespread myths about values. The
first is that beauty is merely
subjective.
The experience of natural beauty suggests important lessons about value
that need clarifying today. One
commonly hears, "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder." On the one hand, the statement is obvious.
On the other hand, it is used to state something that is less obvious.
People disagree about values, about beauty.
Moreover the phrase about the eye of the beholder is designed to assert
that value is subjective--relative to the individual or group doing the
evaluating. A deeper look indicates
that natural beauty illustrates the truth that value is real.
There is a universal pull in the experience of beauty. In an age where community differences are exalted in
opposition to the ideal of universal humanity, the cross-cultural kinship of
appreciative minds enjoying the beauties of nature provides access to common
ground. In the presence of beauty
we feel that we are not merely responding to something that happens to satisfy
our personal preferences, but we want to share our discovery, and we feel that
we are enjoying something that should appeal to everyone (or everyone with a
comparable preparation for the experience).
Though some prefer the mountains to the seashore, the beauties of each
kind of place are widely recognized. The
sublimity of the night sky has evoked awe and reverence in countless souls.
How can a person not feel the pull of the ineffable in the sky?
Of course, in support of the thesis that beauty is real it is not enough
to point out that there are places of beauty such as the Grand Canyon and
Niagara Falls that are sought out by travelers from all over the world.
There are personal and cultural differences, and they are not to be
minimized. Culture affects the
extent to which nature is regarded as the home of ancestral spirits, the
Creator's handiwork, a realm for mystical and allegorical interpretation, a
stock of raw materials for human exploitation, a place for recreation and
character building, or a precious support system for endangered life-forms.
Nevertheless, when the stories of difference are told in sufficient
fullness, difference does not seem like an ultimate, raw datum, merely a matter
of subjective preferences. Rather,
differences are intelligible as responses to the complexity of the landscape of
values. For example, tourists flock
to the beaches of Bali, somewhat to the surprise of the Balinese themselves, who
traditionally regard the mountain at the center of their island as the dwelling
place of the gods. There is a logic
to the Balinese preference. From
the mountain comes the pure water of the rivers that become more dirty
downstream as they are used by more people as the rivers flow finally into the
sea.
Another example of the logic of cultural difference in aesthetic
perception is that Europeans did not appreciate the beauty of mountains and
forests during the centuries when these were fearsome places.
Factors of geography and climate put travelers at risk, and thieves would
lie in wait. As Christianity
demoted nature spirits to demons, the woods became more frightful.
However, as poets, philosophers, and painters joined in conversation
about the sublime and the beautiful and the picturesque, and when the lake
country in England was celebrated in verse, aesthetic appreciation of nature
flourished. This story illustrates
the long cultural evolution required for values to be appreciated.
Our talk of the development of European sensitivity to the beauties of
nature is consistent with the following thesis.
People's aesthetic evaluations will converge so that, at the culmination
of human evolution, everyone will agree. The
convergence thesis, however, despite its merits, overlooks the fact that there
are different personality types. The
ministry of beauty in the personality is fulfilled by different experiences for
different persons. One function of
beauty, for example, is to facilitate relaxation and enjoyment; but some people
need more complex or subtle stimuli than others to satisfy this need.
Another function of beauty is to symbolize qualities of sublime living:
one person gains this value by beholding a mountain, another by climbing it.
Myth
#2: Beauty is incomprehensible
How far can we understand
beauty? If natural science supplies
the paradigm of comprehension, then we cannot comprehend beauty. In determining that an animal is a rabbit, a biologist
applies an idea to an example; precision and certainty are normal.
In telling whether something is beautiful, however, a person needs a
sense of judgment that does not proceed in the same way.
To comprehend beauty does not require a complete, systematic, and
authoritative exposition of beauty. It
does not mean that words can substitute for experience.
It does not mean that humans can construct an equally beautiful replica
on the basis of our knowledge of the laws of the phenomenon.
It does not require an exhaustive inventory of the subconscious and
superconscious moments of our experience.
To affirm that we can comprehend beauty means that we can recognize and
express the features of a beautiful phenomenon, its tensions and unity.
In nature, that which is beautiful appeals to us by contrast with what is
less beautiful. After miles and
miles of highway through endlessly flat, treeless, dusty plains, the look of
forested foothills and flowing water comes as a relief.
After a long hike in the shadows of a forest path, emerging into a sunny
clearing brings a lift. Without the
contrasting background, neither the forest nor the clearing would be so
attractive. Fashion design relies on contrast with previous styles.
There is, nevertheless, a harmony of contrasts intrinsic to the scene
that occasions the recognition of beauty.
After emphasizing the fact that the appreciation of beauty goes beyond
discourse, it is time to balance that thought with the recognition that language
does bring beauty to light. Just
perusing the letters of Vincent Van Gogh, for example, heightens the reader's
sense of natural beauty. Art
history teaches a discipline of describing that conducts careful noticing, for
example, of contrasts and their unification, of line and curve, of light and
shadow, of horizontal and vertical, of color and tone and mood. Great appreciation goes hand in hand with the capacity to
convey the realization of value to others, intelligibly. Thus we move back and forth between the simplicity of wonder
to an articulate expression of thorough appreciation.
Religion
and nature
The first thesis of the religious attitude to natural beauty is to affirm
that the beauties of nature reveal divinity more directly than do ugliness, monotony,
violence, and disease. Though every
moment has its reason for existing as a passing moment, not every moment
reflects equally helpfully the high source and destiny of the evolving whole.
If we distinguish the creation from the Creator, can we still regard the
beauty of physical harmony as a quality of divinity?
Yes, on two conditions. First,
one must remember that, while the mind's sense of harmony arises from material
perception, it is the soul that feels beauty.
When people speak of awe in the face of natural beauty, they are
registering the soul's response. Sheer
overwhelming force, for example, may arouse terror, but awe is a response of a
different order. Second, beauty
itself must be distinguished from any particular beautiful phenomenon.
There is, in general, a distinction is between what has value and what is
value. A true statement is not
truth itself, and yet to grasp a truth is also to grasp (be grasped by) truth.
A good action is not goodness itself, and yet goodness is in a good
action. And a beautiful scene is
not beauty itself, although beauty is present in physical harmony.
Beauty blesses us in a way analogous to the way living truth blesses us
in that in beauty divinity reaches out to give pleasure to the material
creature. Truth, beauty, and
goodness are gifts that encourage us in our adventure.
Since Moses had prohibited the making of images of creatures in works of
art to combat idolatry, Jewish artistic genius had to flow into the channel of
poetry, and it did. "The
heavens are telling the glory of God; and the firmament proclaims his handiwork.
Day to day pours forth speech, and night to night declares
knowledge." From a literary
standpoint, such an affirmation might be considered an act of imagination; from
a philosophic standpoint, a possibility or a postulate.
But faith experiences creation as the handiwork of God.
Nature can be taken as product or as process, and
the process, originating in the creative, ordering, and sustaining act of the
Creator, is what the psalmist feels.
In nature we see repeating cycles, and we also see growth to maturity.
Which phenomenon makes a better metaphor for human existence in the
cosmos? One of the key choices in
religion, cosmology, philosophy of history, and philosophy of nature, is a
choice about priority among these phenomena.
Shall we regard human development as merely a phase in the organic
process of birth and death, or shall we see nature's cycles as serving, in part,
to support the full development of adults?
If destruction and death are just as fundamental as creation and life,
then growth to maturity is merely a phase preceding old age and organic failure.
But if the promise of everlasting life and the quest for perfection are
(objectively) meaningful, then growth to maturity is an earth-scale version of a
cosmic drama in which we pursue an eternal destiny. The literature of the religions of the world abounds in
appealing depictions of visions of realms to which believers look forward.
For faith, earthly beauty anticipates heavenly beauty.
The
religion of nature
Those who regard natural beauty as a gift from the Creator are challenged
today by a rekindled religion of nature. The
very distinction between the Creator and creation, it is argued, devalues nature
and paves the way for environmental abuse.
Look at the religion of the West and the West's history of environmental
abuse, they say. Western religion
has promoted a concept of God as beyond and above nature, a transcendent,
supernatural God. The result has
been to devalue nature. Western
religion has taught that human beings--but not other animals--are made in the
image of God; and this teaching has led to mistreatment of animals. As all sides of this debate can agree, we can discern a
thread of perfection in nature. The
conclusion, so the argument runs, is that we should regard the earth as a
divinity and every creature as (equally) sacred.
People do not abuse what they worship.
Since all sides to this discussion may agree that a thread of perfection
can be discerned in nature, why should we resist the generalization that nature
is perfect? Critics of the history
of environmental abuse in the West, however, do not show that abuse is caused by
devotion to the Creator rather than by lack of stewardship that devotion to the
Creator should promote. The fact
that Christianity has been a dominant religion does not mean that most professed
Christians practice the real thing. The
argument, moreover, does not address pollution in nonwestern countries.
Consider the strong, positive factors in the religion of nature:
The revival of the religion of nature is understandable. Traditional religion fails to hold the minds and hearts of
many people. Ecological problems
become more severe while personal habits and business as usual continue to
produce sad consequences. Moreover, nothing is more natural than for the mind to associate a sense
of sacredness with the entire context in which a spiritual experience arises.
Since nature has so widely been an arena for spiritual experiences in
cultures all over the world, it is not surprising that nature or natural forces,
processes, phenomena, or places should become objects of worship.
In fact, however, recognition of a Creator should enhance care for the
creation, as Amerindian religion demonstrates most dramatically.
In addition, recognition of the position of humankind in evolution should
enhance appreciation for our animal ancestors.
They are not merely members of the food chain but the path evolution took
on the way to us. Religious regard
for the creation as such has inspired sublime poetry and song around the world
celebrating the beauties of nature, and many environmental activists believe in
a Creator. It is not necessary to
worship something in order to value it and care for it properly.
It is not necessary to deny divine transcendence in order to affirm
divine immanence. So long as we
do not think of God as limited by space, there is no reason why an infinite
being cannot be utterly beyond the creation and at the same time omnipresent in
creation. The religion of nature
has done well to criticize anthropocentrism, but is has fallen victim to another
error that could be called visiblism--a
disproportionate regard for what is visible, a failure of faith and imagination
to grasp the invisible spirit world alongside the living things we can see.
Mature religion can let the experience of natural beauty lead us beyond
to the unseen Creator and to the spirit gift dwelling within.
Mature religion can realistically recognize both nature's beauty and its
ugliness, and it can interpret the story of evil and sin that partly explain
nature's present condition. A
religion that energizes the family of humankind can mobilize the cooperation
needed to accomplish what needs to be done on the ecological agenda.
Thus nature can responsibly be regarded as an arena for worship, but not
an object of worship.
The arts and natural beauty
Once I asked an artist friend to take a walk with me along a path in the woods to show me what she sees as an artist. She pointed out colors, textures, moods, and qualities of shape and spatial relationship that I could barely discern even when she told me what to look for. Another friend, guiding my family through the Tate Gallery in London, remarked, "We didn't realize how beautiful our English countryside was until the painters showed us." I can believe it. Artists--of every sort--are custodians of beauty.
A United Nations consultant on the preservation of endangered sites, such
as Angor Wat in Cambodia, and the author of a work of connoisseurship on the
beauties of nature, Christopher Tunnard testifies that the contemplative
appreciation of the beauty of landscape is enhanced, above all, by geological
and biological knowledge and by a knowledge of the history of painting.
Artists devote extraordinary gifts to observing, feeling, and expressing
natural beauty, and the non-specialist should expect to have something to learn
from them. Painters' interpretations expand our aesthetic vocabulary as
observers. Moreover, there are
landscapes that invite comparison with particular styles of painting.
To convey a mystic luminosity in landscape, some painters laid a white
glaze underneath their forest greens, earthen browns, and atmospheric rosy
pinks. The brightness of the glaze,
rarely if ever directly visible, suggested the limited sense in which the divine
is present in nature.
Artists lead people beyond the tendency to crystallize emotions.
It is so easy to imagine standard types of situation calling for standard
emotional responses. One strives to rejoice, for example, when it would be far
more honest and effective to start with a very different feeling and move toward
a different shade of culmination in the experience. Artists challenge stereotyped, conventional responses, lead
us to open ourselves, for example, to the freshness of life in a desert.
Years ago, walking with a romantic companion in the hills, having
anticipated that nature would smile upon our excursion and show off its familiar
attractions, I expressed frustration over the cloudy day and cold wind and lack
of sunshine. My friend responded
that Japanese people learn to appreciate all the aspects of nature.
Indeed, painters have taught humanity to appreciate qualities of fog and
smoke and wilderness, have noticed the green in the human face, the ways in
which the two eyes differ, the link between the earth we tread and the personal
history implicit in a pair of shoes.
Asian painters have often depicted mountains at whose base we begin with
familiar human habitations from which a narrow, winding path leads higher and
higher into a peak obscured by mist. In
the form of a scroll, the painting provides an occasion for friends to recount
stories over the course of an evening. Such
art, as a background for natural experience, reminds us of our sociality as we
venture into nature, of our increasing solitude as we continue our journey, of
our humility before a vast universe, and of the limitations of our knowledge:
the summit can only be inferred from below.
The gifts of poets are hardly less than those of painters in expanding
our sense of the import of natural beauty.
Musicians attune to nature. Perfumes
and gourmet delicacies also present natural beauty.
Massage brings pleasure, even to those who accept self-gratification only
in connection with therapy.
Conclusion
Again and again we return with profit to the simplest lessons for
beginners, for those lessons contain the seeds to be unfolded at each step along
our forward path. The very openness
for recreation, the very relaxation that permits us to seek anew a deepened
acquaintance with experience capacity, the delight in simplicity.
To deepen your initial experience with the beauties of nature,
Inputs from every section of the matrix of truth, beauty, and goodness
expand our awareness of the beauties of nature.
Conversely, appreciating natural beauty enhances the rest of our life.
If we look up, the daylight beauties of local soil and blood and native
language yield to the starlight beauty of being one family, the family of God.
Seeking higher beauty beyond
nature, idealism has sometimes missed the beauty of transformed participation in
nature. Plato taught that we may begin our quest for beauty on a
physical level, with someone who has an attractive body. However, if we
are truly seeking beauty, we will realize that all such bodies have something in
common. None of them is
beauty; rather, they all have beauty. Realizing that insight, we will calm down our excitement and
passionate talk about the one body and move on to the next level.
Then we will recognize the beauty of soul, and we will see that a
beautiful soul has beauty in a greater degree than a beautiful body.
We will be able to be attracted to someone with a beautiful soul even if
the person has an ugly body. For
Plato there are higher levels, too--levels of social and political order, levels
of knowledge and philosophy--that prepare one for the magnificent, dawning
insight into true beauty, one, supreme, and eternal.
Despite his wonderful discoveries, Plato left out part of the story: how
relating to nature can be transformative.
This chapter, more autobiographical than the others, explores
some
blessings from steeping in the beauties of nature
Blessings
and nature
I will never forget the results of a two-week vacation devoted to natural
beauty. At times I had to
concentrate as hard on sustaining my purpose for that vacation as on work.
I visited the San Francisco Bay area in the late summer, moderating the
impulse to get in touch with old friends, staying with my mother, Louise Howard,
a docent at the Stanford Museum and Gallery, and her husband, Fritz Howard, a
master of the bonsai art of cultivating miniature trees.
There was much time for beaches, hikes in the hills, and meditating in
the secluded patio surrounded with the growing trees.
Feeling the unseen presence of the skilled cultivator, patiently training
those trees at every stage along the way from their common beginnings to their
diverse and charming culminations, taking in the sunshine, enjoying a period of
sustained receptivity--all these quiet activities facilitated a genuine
refreshment of mind, soul, and body. I
returned home and began the semester with five weeks of effortlessly gracious
encounter with those I met in the classroom and walking across the campus.
Experiencing others as brothers and sisters, utterly free of distracting
desires or antagonisms, taught me that a deeply refreshed nervous system can
sustain a high level of spiritual awareness.
There is another direction in which one can experience surprising
benefits from a simple natural act. "Just
take a deep breath," people are told, as a way to deal with frustration. Letting
the attention return for a moment to the body releases tension.
When our breathing is shallow and constrained, our posture is poor and
our dignity is hobbled. Countless
meetings begin with the leader inviting the audience to take a few deep breaths.
It seems to be good psycho-physical practice.
Taking time for conscious breathing allows us to find our inner happiness
again.
Another story of the transformative effects of wholesome bodily living
comes from a woman whose cats would sometimes fight with neighbor cats.
She found that as she learned to rest
on her feet, letting her own tension go, she was able to bring peace into
the situation in a way that would often defuse the tension of the cats.
What stories would you add to
this list?
Being
a part of nature
Pursuing natural beauty leads beyond familiar attractions. One afternoon, walking home from the bus stop, moving across
a broad field in my customary way of refreshing myself with beauty, I was
enjoying the field and the fresh air and the autumn leaves on the trees in the
gentle afternoon sunshine. I
experimented by expanding my attention beyond the landscape to the sun as an
object in space. From an imagined
perspective beyond the earth's atmosphere, the sun does not have its place in a
blue sky. I was stunned and
frightened to picture the earth with its thin atmospheric envelope hanging in
the infinite black of a night without context.
The earth no longer felt like home.
Then I understood the perspective of those for whom the discourse of
science is ultimate. I knew I
needed to call on faith, but the voice of faith was abstract.
Feeling it wiser to let the experience run its course, I waited and
thought about the Copernican revolution that exiled the earth from the center of
the universe. The next morning,
refreshed by sleep and ready to worship, I returned to the theme of moving
beyond self-centeredness and geocentrism in appreciating the beauties of nature.
I returned to the previous day's challenge of a perspective beyond the
terrestrial and felt drawn into viewing the earth from above.
I thought about what my purpose on the earth might be and then reflected
on the danger of narcissism in such a facile way of making the earth seem like
home again. A couple of weeks
later, a second moment of horror invaded me in the midst of my walk home as I
reflected on the familiar idea that I am a part of nature.
Not only is there continuity between nature and the physical body, but my
very existence as an observer is a natural existence. I felt strangled with a suddenly powerful feeling of
mortality. Again, I let this
experience run its course, and came out with a deeper intention to make my
mortal life a gift and a deeper sense of how universe beauty includes and
transcends earthly beauty. I had
begun my adventure in natural beauty with favorite places and had enjoyed the
night sky from a complacently terrestrial standpoint; but now the concept of
universe beauty acquired a new depth, and I was ready to begin again.
The first time I tried conscious breathing as a focused exercise at a
Toronto Zen center, I had the sudden realization: "I am a windbag!"
It can be scary to see oneself as simply
a bag of wind. For all the humor in
it, for all the needed self-deflation--Lao Tzu said, "He who feels pricked
must once have been a bubble"--the experience, taken by itself, could be
used as evidence for a thoroughgoing reductionism.
There was no soul, no spirit, no nothing except a physical expansion and
contraction in a vast, impersonal environment of air and greyness utterly devoid
of meaning. Such an experience
makes one realize that the choice gapes wide: What is more true--the reduction
to the windbag or an integral experience in which the windbag moment finds its
place in a broader context? The
very anxiety about that choice is an animal-origin reaction to a threat.
The mind is capable of better. The
"I am a windbag" insight has its mission in dialogue with other
insights, bringing humor to release the attitude of a self-serious, professional
man of words. Nature and
transformation: by letting our natural dimension interrogate our other
dimensions, we integrate our lives.
My conclusion is this. I now
enjoy walking perceptively in nature, feeling being part of nature and knowing
that this participation involves my mortal flesh.
The beauties of nature are a gift and my mind that can enjoy them is a
gift, and following the Giver promises an increase of beauty in this life and
the next.
Levels
of consciousness of natural beauty
Levels-of-consciousness schemes are dangerous.
Sometimes authors use them to position their opponents' view low on the
totem pole. An arbitrary series of
levels, if presented as a temporal sequence, falsifies biography and history.
And such schemes, if they purport to prove anything, substitute
description for argument.
1.
Imagine that our "first" attitude toward nature is simple,
openhearted, childlike enjoyment and delight in earth and sky, water and wind,
and the life of the body.
2.
Then comes the experience of pain, and the heart responds with hurt and
confusion and possibly feelings of cosmic alienation and religious anger.
3.
Then comes a philosophic synthesis, recognizing that nature is both a
source of material blessings while, at the same time, we material creatures are
inherently liable to a host of unwelcome events.
At this level a person says something like, "You have to take the
bitter with the sweet" or "Life is hard, but if you accept this, you
can find a certain happiness."
Then each of the previous moments is taken up in a deeper way, and the
circle is repeated.
4.
On the basis of the previous realizations, then, the person goes forward
and comes to experience the beauty of nature once again.
This time the expressions of appreciation are deeper, despite their
similarity to level one affirmations. "When
I consider the heavens, the work of your hands, the moon and the starts that you
have established, what are human beings that you are mindful of them, mortals
that you care for them?" Beauty
is affirmed as a clearer window than pain to the ultimate character of the
universe and its Source.
5.
When pain comes, it is invested with meaning and experienced as
suffering, a trial of persevering with God "to fulfill all
righteousness."
6.
The philosophic mind now synthesizes the joyous experiences of beauty and
the moments of suffering that deepen our faith.
The product of this synthesis is not an intellectual discourse but a
steady attitude of gratitude for blessings and steadfastness in faith.
Changing
our lives
We know that our beautiful planet is suffering an ecological crisis due
to the actions of human beings, but we are uncertain about how much we need to
change our lives in order to do our part to restore a sustainable, liveable
condition for ourselves and other beings. There
are so many facets of the problem to deal with. Shall we restrain our reproduction? Shall we join an environmental group? How far shall we move toward a vegetarian diet?
We drive to work, passing a jogger here and a bicyclist there, and
wonder: should we have ridden a
bicycle or taken the bus today? It
feels so good, physically and ethically, to ride that bicycle.
To these and other such questions, I have no general answers, but I
observe that sometimes we feel a nagging that is not merely socially
conditioned. The call of conscience
signals a conflict calling us to live on a higher plane.
Sometimes a small adjustment, a minor course correction, is all we need;
but sometimes we need a transformation. The
bigger the change we need, harder it is to let go of old habits, and many
factors distract us from the change we must make.
In what follows, I will address one abuse of natural beauty and human
dignity with social observations and a story of my personal journey.
It can be taken as an essay on Jesus' word, "If the eye is generous,
the whole body will be filled with light."
Living in beauty is made more difficult by tendencies of modern
civilization, where many people pursue beauty divorced from truth and goodness.
One tendency is a philosophic movement that I call
"aestheticism." The
movement begins in skepticism: science is totally revisable, philosophy mere
opinion, and religion an illusion; morality and ethics are techniques of social
control. Aestheticism then proposes
beauty as the hope of the human spirit and as a foundation for all other values.
Another tendency I call vitalism. Vitality is one of the genuine beauties of the body, but the
appreciation of vitality is distorted in Fascism, past and present.
Vitality and values associated with it--health, vigor, and
decisiveness--are exalted above moral and spiritual values.
One of the beauties of the body is its capacity for enjoying pleasure.
Pleasure is a part of happiness, and, since parents express love by
providing for their children's pleasures, pleasure early becomes a symbol
of love. Happily, there are many,
many pleasures consistent with health and personal welfare; but millions of
people only arrive at a healthy attitude to pleasure by the detours of
corruption and self-denial.
Contemporary society suffers in crisis regarding sex, marriage, and the
family. The beauty of the human
body is exploited as a stimulus for sexual desire.
Vanity, immaturity, confusion, lack of self-respect, the comforts of
modern life, commercialism, acceptance of exploitation in the media, and
hedonistic indulgence conspire with disease and aggression to make sex a major
cause of suffering and the pet evil of a large proportion of our planet's
burgeoning population. More than
two-thirds of the children in some groups are born out of wedlock; more than
half of marriages in the United States now end in divorce, and the marriage rate is falling.
Moreover, in the face of this breakdown of civilization, many social
scientists offer neutral, pluralistic, and facilitating messages.
High schools distribute condoms because they cannot restrain teenage
sexual activity. Health workers
focus their efforts on women because it does so little good to try to get men to
be responsible. Rape has begun to
be used as an instrument of military policy and ethnic degradation.
The problem is not new. Confucius
said that he never met a man whose desire for goodness was stronger than his
sexual desire; and Sonnet 129 expresses Shakespeare' pessimism.
The expense of spirit in a waste of shame
Is lust in action; and till action, lust
Is purjured, murd'rous, bloody, full of blame,
Savage, extreme, rude, cruel, not to trust;
Enjoy'd no sooner but despised straight;
Past reason hunted; and no sooner had,
Past reason hated, as a swallow'd bait,
On purpose laid to make the taker mad:
Mad in pursuit, and in possession so;
Had, having, and in quest to have, extreme;
A bliss in proof, and proved, a very woe;
Before, a joy proposed; behind, a dream.
All this the world
well knows; yet none knows well
To shun the heaven
that leads men to this hell.
Will anything short of a spiritual renaissance have the power to reverse
such trends? The abuse of physical
pleasure is so common that few believe in the potential for a world-wide moral
and spiritual awakening that will empower self-mastery to replace
self-indulgence. Imagine a certain ideal: a healthy and mature couple, whose parents provided instruction in
sex, wait until marriage for their experiential learning.
Apart from times when they practice birth control, they engage in sexual
intercourse in the hope of conceiving a child.
Growing in self-mastery
Before reading further, spend a minute bringing to mind the recollection
of a time when you were functioning at your best.
Recall how unified it felt, as all the energies of the personality were
harmoniously mobilized. During that
time, did you experience situations that you normally find challenging or
tempting? If so, how did you handle
those situations when you were at your best?
When we are not at our best, we fall into all sorts of appetites and
emotions that are not beautiful. Realizing
this, and desiring to live in a better way, we experience a tension
between--there are many ways to express it--the lower self and the higher self,
our material emotions from the animal-origin nature and the higher intellectual,
moral, and spiritual dimensions of the personality.
Self-mastery is the condition of living in which the higher dimensions of
the personality are the effective leaders.
Rationalist philosophy would say that our best thinking governs our
actions rather than having our material emotions in the driver's seat.
Religious philosophy would add that our lives proceed from a motivation
dominated by the divine spirit.
How can we move beyond a cheapening pursuit of pleasure without engaging
in civil war against our own impulses? A
variety of insights are summarized in a discussion from The
Urantia Book, contrasting the religion of self-examination and self-denial
with a different message of self-forgetfulness and self-control.
By
the old way you seek to suppress, obey, and conform to the rules of living; by
the new way you are first transformed
by the Spirit of Truth and thereby strengthened in your inner soul by the
constant spiritual renewing of your mind, and so are you endowed with the power
of the certain and joyous performance of the gracious, acceptable, and perfect
will of God. Forget not--it is your
personal faith in the exceedingly great and precious promises of God that
ensures your becoming partakers of the divine nature.
We have three options: foolish self-indulgence, overconscientious self-denial, and wise, transformed living. Each cycle of decision and action strengthens one habit or another. Habits involve the synaptic connections between neurons in the brain. As you construct a new superhighway of a better habit of living next to the narrow and dangerous road of a bad habit, the old road eventually breaks up as the grasses of new life take over what is no longer in use.
Spiritual living alters the very quality of perception.
It is natural for self-interest to govern perception.
However, dedication to the love of God and the service of others
transforms perception. Beauty
becomes not only an object of experience but a quality of experiencing.
Perceiving is never neutral. Perception
is dominated either by a material or by a spiritual attitude, and there is a
subtle difference between materially-centered perceiving and spiritually
centered perceiving. The center of
gravity is always in one place or the other.
"If the eye is generous, the whole body is filled with light."
Conclusion
We can call on beauty, and voilą:
There is beauty as divine spirit presence, infusing its grace into perceiving
from within. Beauty, in other words,
is a name for God as well as a name for a value that we can experience and live.
Vision proceeds from within, and when seeing is spiritually centered the
visual experience participates in beauty. To
repeat a quote from Mencius, "A noble man steeps himself in the Way (tao) because he wishes to find it in himself.
When he finds it in himself, he will be at ease in it; when he is at ease
in it, he can draw deeply upon it; when he can draw deeply upon it, he finds its
source wherever he turns."
The greatest beauty of the human body, then, is not on the level of
perceptual appeal, and the greatest pleasures are not material. The body's greatest
beauty is its capacity to operate in smooth subordination to the purposes of
spirit made effective by the decisions of mind.
The biochemical system of flesh and organs and hormones and neurons can
integrate into a wider system including emotions and intellect and moral ideals,
a system whose nucleus is the indwelling divine spirit.
The most essential function of the human body is to support a mind
capable of receiving and responding to the spirit.
Through the mediation of mind, the body is the temple of the spirit.
Therefore, spiritually infused perception is essential to living in
beauty in a way integrated with truth and goodness.
Scientific and philosophic reflections open up helpful perspectives.
The power needed for success, however, comes from the spirit, which alone
enables one to move beyond mere self-control to the spontaneity of self-mastery.
For the human will to struggle to resolve a conflict between the spirit
and the flesh is ineffective. Persistent
and wholehearted decisions to align with spirit, however, are surprisingly
powerful. Momentary victories may
be won by lesser techniques; but in order for the motto, "Mind over
matter" to be graciously practiced, "Spirit over mind" must come
first. Those who nurture good
habits or overcome bad habits know the joy and liberty of self-mastery; it is
not a repressive, obsessive, moralistic, vigilant, negative campaign of force,
but a harmony that arises when each element in the personality system functions
in its proper place.
This chapter has developed three main thoughts.
First, the beauties of nature are usually in the background, not the
foreground, of our attention. Spending
focused time, however, steeping oneself in natural beauty, not only provides a pleasant background layer of awareness of our marvelous planet.
In addition, enjoying the hospitality of mother nature can energize our
spiritual and social life.
Second, realizing that we are part of nature can have a heartening or
shocking or humorous impact. The
realization makes us face our mortality. It
humbles our pride and heals our isolation.
The paradox of the human being is to be part of nature while in some way
transcending nature. A balanced
philosophy acknowledges both.
Third, the beauties of nature include the pleasures of the body. Modern civilization urgently needs to learn self-mastery, to find better ways of satisfying our natural urges. The greatest beauty of the body is its capacity to integrate with a spiritual transformation. Transformation goes beyond moral self-discipline to center our very perceptual life in the beauty of the divine presence.