Proving Existential Propositions
Recall, a statement in the form:
∃x ∈ D such that propositional function Q(x)
is true if, and only if,
Q(x) is true for at least one x in Domain D.
There are two ways to prove this:
1. To find an x that makes Q(x) true.
2. To give a set of direction for finding an x that makes propositional function Q(x) true.
Examples of Constructive Proofs of Existence:
Example 1: Prove the following existential statement:
∃ an even integer n that can be written in two ways as the sum of two prime numbers.
Proof of Existence:
Suppose n = 10. Then, we can certainly write:
10 = 5 + 5
= 3 + 9
Clearly, 3, 5 and 9 are all primes.
We have shown that a given statement Q(x) is true for 3, 5 and 7 in the set of primes.
Example 2: Prove the following existential statement:
∃ an integer k such that (22r + 18s = 2k), where r and s are integers.
Proof of Existence:
Suppose k = 11r + 9s. Then, clearly k is an integer (why? because it is a sum of product of integers.) and by substitution we have:
2k = 2(11r + 9s)
= 22 + 18s
We have shown that the given statement Q(x) is true for an integer (11r + 9s).
Example 3: Prove the following existential statement:
There is an integer n > 5 such that 2n - 1 is prime number.
Using quantifier i.e. a little more formally:
∃ an integer n > 5 such that 2n - 1 is prime.
Proof of Existence:
Suppose n = 7 (which is prime.) Then, we have
2n - 1 = 27 - 1
= 128 - 1
= 127
And 127 is a prime number.
We have shown that the given statement Q(x) is true for at least one n = 7 in the set of prime numbers.
Example 4: Prove the following existential statement:
There are positive integers the sum of whose reciprocals is an integer.
Using quantifier i.e. a little more formally:
∃ a positive integers m and n such that the sum of whose reciprocals is an integer.
Proof of Existence:
Suppose m = 2 and n = 2. Then
1/m + 1/m = 1/2 + 1/2
Reciprocals:
m + n = 1.
We have shown that the given statement Q(x) is true for m = 2 and n = 2 in the set of positive integers.
Non Constructive Proof of Existence
This method involves showing showing the following:
Either: | The existence of a value of variable x that makes propositional function Q(x) true is guaranteed by an axiom or a theorem (previously proved propositions.) |
Or: | The assumption that there is no such propositional variable x leads to a contradiction. |